八百电影观后感

我本身是干跟组的。我同事有在八百组里的，当时就微信跟我说，看监视器时候都感动的流泪了。所以我对八百一直挺期待的。想着一定去看看，

三四年了吧，终于上映。昨天去电影院看了电影。咋说呢，并没有传说中那么好吧。

现在很多人拥簇百八，很大原因是电影是有历史原型。而那些百八批评者，批评他是因为他没有基于历史原型。

我觉得评价电影，不能用他有没有正确演义历史来评价。宣发说他是历史剧但是他没做到正确的输出，那也和评价电影本身优劣无关。

我就从单纯的电影本身聊聊。

八百看得出来，在摄影，美术，制景，道具，化妆，特效CG。可以说就是中国电影工业顶级水平。这些是要肯定的

但是在看电影，也有很多尬的地方。我就聊聊我觉得尬的地方。

在选角上。用大牌脸熟演员是个问题。我看很多大国产片都觉得尬。不是说他们演技问题。因为脸太熟了，出场时，很容易思绪跳出剧情。比如，团长杜淳出来时候，我就总联想到插印小天，想到一年逛两次海澜之家。姚晨出来时候我就想他会不会再去酒店敲门，甚至敲杜淳的门，后来一想不会，因为摄影是他老公，应该没什么机会。还有刘晓庆出场，我在想这七十多了吧，完全跳出剧情。

还有就是主线人物太多了。正常的电影，主要人物就一个两个。配角人物也不会太多。比如拯救大兵瑞恩，一个小队人，汤姆汉克斯为主，小队其它成员为辅。人物存在，推动剧情。剧情也丰满着人物。所以七八个人都塑造成了个性鲜明有骨有肉的。

百八人物太多，还没有没那么多篇幅，很多人物都鸡肋了。

比如姚晨这个人物，还有教授夫妇，黑社会老大，赌场老板，送电话线的黑社会，唱戏的班主，等等。基本都没头没尾的，人物塑造缺失，人物前后没有变化。对剧情推动也没作用。

这些人物都可有可无，单独去掉一个两个对整部电影没有丝毫影响。我觉得几个角色合并为两个三个正好。

仓库里也是。人物太多。而且很多角色性格重合。估计是都有历史原型人物的吧。但是都有历史原型也不用都去刻画和描写。

导演还用了那么大的篇幅，去描写好几个怂包。电影主题是不要忘了那些为家国舍身取义的壮士们。那么描写当兵的怂包，是不是篇幅有些多了?

参考翻译：

I am a teammate. My colleague was in the 800 team, and told me on WeChat that they were moved to tears when they watched the monitor. So I have been looking forward to 800. Thinking of going to see it,

It's been three or four years, finally it's released. I went to the cinema to watch a movie yesterday. Speaking of it, it's not as good as the legend.

Nowadays, there are many people in the crowd. The big reason is that movies have historical prototypes. And those critics criticized him because he was not based on historical archetypes.

I think the evaluation of movies cannot be based on whether he has the correct history of the romance. Announcing that he is a historical drama but he did not achieve the correct output, it has nothing to do with evaluating the quality of the movie itself.

I just talked about the movie itself.

Eight hundred can see it in photography, art, scenery, props, makeup, and special effects CG. It can be said to be the top level of China's film industry. These are to be sure

But there are many awkward places when watching movies. I just talk about what I feel embarrassing.

On the casting. Familiarizing actors with big-name faces is a problem. I feel embarrassed when I watch many major domestic films. It's not that they have acting skills. Because the face is too familiar, it is easy to think out of the plot when playing. For example, when the head of Du Chun came out, I always thought of Interyin Xiaotian, and thought of visiting Hailan House twice a year. When Yao Chen came out, I wondered if he would knock on the door of the hotel or even Du Chun's door again. Later I thought about not, because photography is his husband, so there should be no chance. There is also Liu Xiaoqing on the stage, I am thinking that this is more than 70, completely out of the plot.

There are too many main characters. In a normal movie, there are only two main characters. There are not too many supporting roles. For example, to save Private Ryan, a team member, Tom Hanks is the main one, and the other members of the team are auxiliary. Characters exist and drive the plot. The plot is also full of characters. So seven or eight people have been portrayed as individuals with distinctive personalities.

There are too many characters, not so much space, and many characters are tasteless.

For example, the character Yao Chen, as well as the professor and his wife, the boss of the underworld, the boss of the casino, the underworld who sent the phone line, the cast of the opera, and so on. There is basically no beginning or end, lack of characterization, and no changes before and after the characters. It has no effect on the promotion of the plot.

These characters are optional, and removing one or two alone has no effect on the whole movie. I think it is just right to merge several roles into two or three.

The same goes for the warehouse. Too many characters. And many characters overlap. It is estimated that there are historical archetypes. But there are historical prototypes and there is no need to portray and describe them all.

The director also used such a large space to describe several counseling packages. The theme of the movie is not to forget those strong men who sacrificed their lives for their homeland. So, is there too much space to describe how to serve as a soldier?